{"id":5800,"date":"2025-05-14T14:23:08","date_gmt":"2025-05-14T14:23:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/?p=5800"},"modified":"2025-05-14T14:23:09","modified_gmt":"2025-05-14T14:23:09","slug":"jurisdiction-judge-artwork-public-domain","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/jurisdiction-judge-artwork-public-domain\/","title":{"rendered":"Copyright: jurisdiction of the administrative court in place of the judicial court to order repair on an artwork in the public domain"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><strong><em>Paris Court of appeal, 5<sup>th<\/sup> pole, 1<sup>st<\/sup> chamber, April 9<sup>th<\/sup>, 2025, no. 24\/18170<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>IMPACT: <\/em><\/strong><em>In this ruling, the Paris Court of Appeal endorses a precedent established by the French Court of conflicts (\u201cTribunal des conflits\u201d), stating that when an infringement of copyright is claimed as a result of alterations made to a public artwork, the Judicial Court has jurisdiction only to rule on the existence of a violation of moral rights and any potential damages.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>However, the Administrative Court has jurisdiction to order work to be carried out on the artwork (repair, moving\u2026).<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong><em>The facts<\/em><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>As part of an agreement with a local municipality, an artist created an artwork of art consisting of three columns ten metres high and one metre in diameter, entitled &#8220;Les Piliers de la R\u00e9publique&#8221; (&#8220;The Pillars of the Republic&#8221;).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In June 2023, the artist&#8217;s right holders discovered that the artwork had been dismantled for restoration and moved to a neighbouring town.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>After unsuccessful formal notices and the inauguration of the artwork in its new location, the rights holders brought proceedings against the city before the Paris Judicial Court to seek damages, as well as the reinstallation of the artwork in its original location.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As the pre-trial judge of the Paris Judicial Court declared that he had no jurisdiction to rule on the request for the work to be reinstalled, in favour of the administrative court, an appeal was lodged.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong><em>Copyright versus principle of the intangibility of public works<\/em><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>On appeal, the rights holders argued in particular that:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><div style=\"margin-left: 2em; line-height: 1.4; margin-bottom: 0;\">\n  <p style=\"margin: 0;\"> (i) their claims are based on the artist&#8217;s moral rights,which fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Judicial Court;<\/p>\n  <p style=\"margin: 0;\"> (ii) the monument is an artwork protected by copyright, and not merely a public work;<\/p>\n  <p style=\"margin: 0;\"> (iii) their request does not seek to alter the public work but to restore it to its original state.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>On its side, the municipality considered that the artwork also falls within the the public domain property, as it is the owner thereof. It invokes the principle of the intangibility of public works, which prohibits the judicial court from ordering any measure likely to affect them.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong><em>The Judicial Court\u2019s principle jurisdiction in matter of infringement of moralrights by public entities versus public entities<\/em><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>First, the Court, relying on a case law of the Court of conflicts<a href=\"#_ftn1\" id=\"_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a>, points out that, because of the Judicial Court\u2019s exclusive jurisdiction in matters of literary and artistic property (art. L.331-1 of the French Code of intellectual property), the Judicial Court has jurisdiction to hear contractual or tort liability claims brought against a public entity where an infringement of literary and artistic property, particularly of moral rights, is alleged.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Court concludes that the Judicial Court has jurisdiction to rule on the existence of the alleged infringement and damages.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the present case, it thus finds that the Judicial Court must rule on the rights holders\u2019 claim for damages based on a violation of the artist\u2019s moral rights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong><em>The exclusive jurisdiction of the Administrative Court over requests to alter a public work based on moral rights<\/em><\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>Secondly, the Court reiterated the reasoning of another ruling handed down by the Court of conflicts<a href=\"#_ftn2\" id=\"_ftnref2\">[2]<\/a>, which stated that the Intellectual Property Code does not &#8220;<em> grant to the judicial court the authority to order any measure likely, in any way whatsoever, to affect the integrity of a public work<\/em>&#8220;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In this case, \u201cLes Piliers de la R\u00e9publique\u201d is a public work, meaning that the rights holders who are requesting the relocation of the artwork as well as modifications must refer the matter to the Administrative Court.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Court held that the limited jurisdiction of the Judicial Court &#8220;<em>implies, solely, <\/em>[if the claimant] <em>intends to obtain, in addition to compensation for his loss, measures likely to affect the integrity of a public work, to refer precisely this point to the administrative courts<\/em>&#8220;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The Court of Appeal thus upholds the lower court\u2019s ruling in its entirety.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Accordingly, jurisdiction is allocated as follows:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><strong>The <u>Judicial Court<\/u> rules on the existence of an infringement of moral rights and any alleged damages but cannot order any modifications or relocation of the public work.<\/strong><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><strong>If <u>the Administrative Court<\/u> is directly seized of a request to modify the public work based on an alleged infringement of moral rights, it may only rule once the Judicial Court has determined the existence of the infringement and the damages claimed.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<div data-wp-interactive=\"core\/file\" class=\"wp-block-file\"><object data-wp-bind--hidden=\"!state.hasPdfPreview\" hidden class=\"wp-block-file__embed\" data=\"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Focus-IP-ENG.pdf\" type=\"application\/pdf\" style=\"width:100%;height:600px\" aria-label=\"Embed of Focus IP.\"><\/object><a id=\"wp-block-file--media-2667330e-06cf-4aba-92a4-eec0f97a58c1\" href=\"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Focus-IP-ENG.pdf\">Focus IP<\/a><a href=\"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/05\/Focus-IP-ENG.pdf\" class=\"wp-block-file__button wp-element-button\" download aria-describedby=\"wp-block-file--media-2667330e-06cf-4aba-92a4-eec0f97a58c1\">T\u00e9l\u00e9charger<\/a><\/div>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p><a id=\"_ftn1\" href=\"#_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a> Court of conflicts, July 7<sup>th<\/sup>, 2014, n\u00b0C3954<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref2\" id=\"_ftn2\">[2]<\/a> Court of conflicts , Sept. 5<sup>th<\/sup>, 2016, n\u00b04069, <em>M. [N]. <\/em><em>N. v. Association philharmonique de Paris<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Paris Court of appeal, 5th pole, 1st chamber, April 9th, 2025, no. 24\/18170 IMPACT: In this ruling, the Paris Court of Appeal endorses a precedent established by the French Court of conflicts (\u201cTribunal des conflits\u201d), stating that when an infringement of copyright is claimed as a result of alterations made to a public artwork, the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5800","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-veille-juridique"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Copyright: jurisdiction of the administrative court in place of the judicial court to order repair on an artwork in the public domain - JP Karsenty<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/jurisdiction-judge-artwork-public-domain\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Copyright: jurisdiction of the administrative court in place of the judicial court to order repair on an artwork in the public domain - JP Karsenty\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Paris Court of appeal, 5th pole, 1st chamber, April 9th, 2025, no. 24\/18170 IMPACT: In this ruling, the Paris Court of Appeal endorses a precedent established by the French Court of conflicts (\u201cTribunal des conflits\u201d), stating that when an infringement of copyright is claimed as a result of alterations made to a public artwork, the [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/jurisdiction-judge-artwork-public-domain\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"JP Karsenty\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-05-14T14:23:08+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-05-14T14:23:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Karsenty\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Karsenty\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/jurisdiction-judge-artwork-public-domain\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/jurisdiction-judge-artwork-public-domain\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Karsenty\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5a419e74cf5fd7e5314e1877dac11322\"},\"headline\":\"Copyright: jurisdiction of the administrative court in place of the judicial court to order repair on an artwork in the public domain\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-14T14:23:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-05-14T14:23:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/jurisdiction-judge-artwork-public-domain\/\"},\"wordCount\":780,\"articleSection\":[\"Legal watch\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/jurisdiction-judge-artwork-public-domain\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/jurisdiction-judge-artwork-public-domain\/\",\"name\":\"Copyright: jurisdiction of the administrative court in place of the judicial court to order repair on an artwork in the public domain - JP Karsenty\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2025-05-14T14:23:08+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-05-14T14:23:09+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5a419e74cf5fd7e5314e1877dac11322\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/jurisdiction-judge-artwork-public-domain\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/jurisdiction-judge-artwork-public-domain\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/jurisdiction-judge-artwork-public-domain\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Copyright: jurisdiction of the administrative court in place of the judicial court to order repair on an artwork in the public domain\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/\",\"name\":\"JP Karsenty\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5a419e74cf5fd7e5314e1877dac11322\",\"name\":\"Karsenty\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/520ca91b59595a2eed8650370112443faca59b88c5b8871d8ca2b8b38badbd02?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/520ca91b59595a2eed8650370112443faca59b88c5b8871d8ca2b8b38badbd02?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Karsenty\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Copyright: jurisdiction of the administrative court in place of the judicial court to order repair on an artwork in the public domain - JP Karsenty","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/jurisdiction-judge-artwork-public-domain\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Copyright: jurisdiction of the administrative court in place of the judicial court to order repair on an artwork in the public domain - JP Karsenty","og_description":"Paris Court of appeal, 5th pole, 1st chamber, April 9th, 2025, no. 24\/18170 IMPACT: In this ruling, the Paris Court of Appeal endorses a precedent established by the French Court of conflicts (\u201cTribunal des conflits\u201d), stating that when an infringement of copyright is claimed as a result of alterations made to a public artwork, the [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/jurisdiction-judge-artwork-public-domain\/","og_site_name":"JP Karsenty","article_published_time":"2025-05-14T14:23:08+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-05-14T14:23:09+00:00","author":"Karsenty","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Karsenty","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/jurisdiction-judge-artwork-public-domain\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/jurisdiction-judge-artwork-public-domain\/"},"author":{"name":"Karsenty","@id":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5a419e74cf5fd7e5314e1877dac11322"},"headline":"Copyright: jurisdiction of the administrative court in place of the judicial court to order repair on an artwork in the public domain","datePublished":"2025-05-14T14:23:08+00:00","dateModified":"2025-05-14T14:23:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/jurisdiction-judge-artwork-public-domain\/"},"wordCount":780,"articleSection":["Legal watch"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/jurisdiction-judge-artwork-public-domain\/","url":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/jurisdiction-judge-artwork-public-domain\/","name":"Copyright: jurisdiction of the administrative court in place of the judicial court to order repair on an artwork in the public domain - JP Karsenty","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2025-05-14T14:23:08+00:00","dateModified":"2025-05-14T14:23:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5a419e74cf5fd7e5314e1877dac11322"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/jurisdiction-judge-artwork-public-domain\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/jurisdiction-judge-artwork-public-domain\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/jurisdiction-judge-artwork-public-domain\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Copyright: jurisdiction of the administrative court in place of the judicial court to order repair on an artwork in the public domain"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/","name":"JP Karsenty","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/#\/schema\/person\/5a419e74cf5fd7e5314e1877dac11322","name":"Karsenty","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/520ca91b59595a2eed8650370112443faca59b88c5b8871d8ca2b8b38badbd02?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/520ca91b59595a2eed8650370112443faca59b88c5b8871d8ca2b8b38badbd02?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Karsenty"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5800","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5800"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5800\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5807,"href":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5800\/revisions\/5807"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5800"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5800"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.jpkarsenty.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5800"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}